Attorney General's Reference No 76 Of 2002 [2002] EWCA Crim 2344 (3 October 2002)
Although the sentence was lenient, it was within the proper exercise of the judge's sentencing discretion given the offender's character, remorse, and the absence of aggravating factors. A non-custodial sentence was justified in this case.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Crim 2344
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Offender/respondent: James Hodges
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Attorney General's Reference (criminal) / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- No further order; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Causing Death by Dangerous Driving, Sentencing, Attorney General's Reference, Appeal Against Leniency
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
James Hodges
Offender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Attorney General's Reference (criminal) / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for causing death by dangerous driving was unduly lenient
Ratio Decidendi
Although the sentence was lenient, it was within the proper exercise of the judge's sentencing discretion given the offender's character, remorse, and the absence of aggravating factors. A non-custodial sentence was justified in this case.
Court Disposition
No further order; appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment