Stewart, Re [2016] EWCA Crim 2238 (16 December 2016)
The offender's conduct constituted a deliberate and flagrant disregard for safety and training, justifying categorisation as level 1 under the Sentencing Guidelines. The original sentence was unduly lenient; the appropriate sentence after trial is 7 years' imprisonment.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Crim 2238
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent/offender: William Anthony Stewart
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988) / Appeal Against Sentence; Reference for Unduly Lenient Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Causing Death by Dangerous Driving, Sentencing Guidelines, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Categorisation of Offence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
William Anthony Stewart
Respondent/offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988) / Appeal Against Sentence; Reference for Unduly Lenient Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the original sentence for causing death by dangerous driving unduly lenient?
- 2 What is the correct categorisation of the offence under sentencing guidelines?
Ratio Decidendi
The offender's conduct constituted a deliberate and flagrant disregard for safety and training, justifying categorisation as level 1 under the Sentencing Guidelines. The original sentence was unduly lenient; the appropriate sentence after trial is 7 years' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence increased
Orders
- Original sentence quashed
- Substituted sentence of 7 years' imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment