Attorney General's Reference No. 83 and 84 of 2004 [2006] EWCA Crim 2032 (20 July 2006)
The statutory assumptions under the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 apply to the calculation of benefit for a convicted drug trafficker, even if the defendant was acquitted on a related count covering a longer period, unless the defendant can show on the balance of probabilities that the assets were not the proceeds of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Crim 2032
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent/offender: Jerome Legall; Respondent/offender: Tracy Macaulay
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Attorney General's Reference (criminal) / Appeal/review of Confiscation Orders Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Confiscation orders made against both offenders in agreed amounts; time to pay and default terms set.
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Orders, Drug Trafficking, Statutory Assumptions, Double Jeopardy, Sentencing Review
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Jerome Legall
Respondent/offender
Tracy Macaulay
Respondent/offender
Procedural Posture
Attorney General's Reference (criminal) / Appeal/review of Confiscation Orders Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether statutory assumptions under the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 can be applied to benefit calculation for a convicted drug trafficker who was acquitted on a related count covering a longer period than the count of conviction.
- 2 Whether applying statutory assumptions in such circumstances creates a serious risk of injustice or double jeopardy.
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory assumptions under the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 apply to the calculation of benefit for a convicted drug trafficker, even if the defendant was acquitted on a related count covering a longer period, unless the defendant can show on the balance of probabilities that the assets were not the proceeds of drug trafficking or that applying the assumptions would create a serious risk of injustice. Mere acquittal on a count does not suffice to disapply the assumptions.
Court Disposition
Confiscation orders made against both offenders in agreed amounts; time to pay and default terms set.
Orders
- Confiscation order against Jerome Legall in the sum of £148,000, to be paid within six months, with three years' imprisonment in default, consecutive to current sentence.
- Confiscation order against Tracy Macaulay in the sum of £54,395.16, to be paid within three months, with two years' imprisonment in default.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment