Attorney General's Reference No. 66 OF 2005 [2005] EWCA Crim 2445 (25 August 2005)
The sentence of six months was unduly lenient given the aggravating factors and relevant case law; the appropriate sentence should have been at least two years, but considering double jeopardy, a sentence of 15 months' imprisonment is substituted.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Crim 2445
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Offender/respondent: Fraser Gormanly
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference (unduly Lenient Sentence) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Attorney General's Reference
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Sentencing, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors, Double Jeopardy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Fraser Gormanly
Offender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference (unduly Lenient Sentence) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Attorney General's Reference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of six months' imprisonment for robbery was unduly lenient
- 2 What is the appropriate sentence for robbery of a vulnerable premises with aggravating and mitigating factors
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of six months was unduly lenient given the aggravating factors and relevant case law; the appropriate sentence should have been at least two years, but considering double jeopardy, a sentence of 15 months' imprisonment is substituted.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence increased
Orders
- Sentence of six months' imprisonment quashed
- Substituted sentence of 15 months' imprisonment to run from the original sentencing date
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment