Attorney General's Reference No. 66 OF 2005 [2005] EWCA Crim 2445 (25 August 2005)

Attorney General's Reference No. 66 OF 2005 [2005] EWCA Crim 2445 (25 August 2005)

The sentence of six months was unduly lenient given the aggravating factors and relevant case law; the appropriate sentence should have been at least two years, but considering double jeopardy, a sentence of 15 months' imprisonment is substituted.

Citation
[2005] EWCA Crim 2445
Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Offender/respondent: Fraser Gormanly
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 August 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference (unduly Lenient Sentence) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Attorney General's Reference
Outcome
Appeal allowed; sentence increased
Legal Topics
Robbery, Sentencing, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors, Double Jeopardy

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Fraser Gormanly

Offender/respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Reference (unduly Lenient Sentence) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Attorney General's Reference

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of six months' imprisonment for robbery was unduly lenient
  2. 2 What is the appropriate sentence for robbery of a vulnerable premises with aggravating and mitigating factors

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence of six months was unduly lenient given the aggravating factors and relevant case law; the appropriate sentence should have been at least two years, but considering double jeopardy, a sentence of 15 months' imprisonment is substituted.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; sentence increased

Orders

  • Sentence of six months' imprisonment quashed
  • Substituted sentence of 15 months' imprisonment to run from the original sentencing date