Attorney General's Reference No. 110 OF 2004 [2004] EWCA Crim 3287 (16 December 2004)
The original sentence was unduly lenient because the offence of possession with intent to supply Class A drugs ordinarily requires a custodial sentence, and the sentencing judge erred in linking the sentence to a previous non-custodial sentence for theft. The appropriate sentence is 18 months' imprisonment.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Crim 3287
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Offender: Christopher Keylock
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Sentence increased to 18 months' imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Possession With Intent to Supply, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Double Jeopardy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Christopher Keylock
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for possession of Class A drugs with intent to supply was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred by linking the sentence to a previous non-custodial sentence for theft
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence was unduly lenient because the offence of possession with intent to supply Class A drugs ordinarily requires a custodial sentence, and the sentencing judge erred in linking the sentence to a previous non-custodial sentence for theft. The appropriate sentence is 18 months' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
Sentence increased to 18 months' imprisonment
Orders
- Offender to surrender to police by 4:30 pm for sentence to commence immediately
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment