JM, R v [2017] EWCA Crim 2458 (31 October 2017)
The original sentence was unduly lenient due to judicial error regarding maximum sentencing powers. The correct approach required reference to the modern equivalent offence (rape of a child under 13), adjustment for statutory maxima, and consideration of the offender's youth and maturity. Exceptional circumstances justified suspending the custodial sentence.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Crim 2458
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent/offender: JM
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (sentence Reference) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Sentence quashed and replaced
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Indecent Assault, Rape of a Child, Youth Offenders, Unduly Lenient Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
JM
Respondent/offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (sentence Reference) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was unduly lenient
- 2 Proper approach to sentencing for historic sexual offences committed by youth
- 3 Identification of modern equivalent offence for sentencing purposes
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence was unduly lenient due to judicial error regarding maximum sentencing powers. The correct approach required reference to the modern equivalent offence (rape of a child under 13), adjustment for statutory maxima, and consideration of the offender's youth and maturity. Exceptional circumstances justified suspending the custodial sentence.
Court Disposition
Sentence quashed and replaced
Orders
- Original community order quashed
- Substituted sentence of 24 months' imprisonment suspended for 12 months
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment