RF, R. v [2017] EWCA Crim 1890 (31 October 2017)
The original suspended sentence of 2 years was unduly lenient given the gravity, repeated nature, and aggravating features of the offences. The correct approach under the Sentencing Council Guidelines required a starting point of at least 6 years, with a full discount for guilty plea resulting in a custodial sentence of 4 years. Taking into account time already served, the appropriate sentence is 3 years and 10 months' imprisonment on each count, concurrent.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Crim 1890
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Offender/respondent: RF
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; original sentences quashed and substituted with custodial sentences.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Unduly Lenient Sentences, Sexual Activity With a Child Family Member
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
RF
Offender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the original sentence for sexual activity with a child family member was unduly lenient
- 2 Proper categorisation of harm and culpability under Sentencing Council Guidelines
Ratio Decidendi
The original suspended sentence of 2 years was unduly lenient given the gravity, repeated nature, and aggravating features of the offences. The correct approach under the Sentencing Council Guidelines required a starting point of at least 6 years, with a full discount for guilty plea resulting in a custodial sentence of 4 years. Taking into account time already served, the appropriate sentence is 3 years and 10 months' imprisonment on each count, concurrent.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; original sentences quashed and substituted with custodial sentences.
Orders
- Sentences of 2 years' imprisonment suspended on counts 1-4 quashed.
- Substituted with 3 years and 10 months' imprisonment on each of counts 1-4, concurrent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment