Zaheerl, R. v [2018] EWCA Crim 1708 (06 July 2018)
The reduction from the notional sentence for a completed rape to reflect the attempt was excessive in this case, given the proximity to completion, aggravating features, and impact on the victim. The original sentence was unduly lenient and a sentence of 5 years and 6 months' imprisonment was the minimum appropriate.
- Citation
- [2018] EWCA Crim 1708
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Offender/respondent: Javed Zaheer
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (reference by Attorney General) / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Sentence quashed and substituted.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Attempted Rape, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Sexual Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Javed Zaheer
Offender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (reference by Attorney General) / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for attempted rape was unduly lenient
- 2 Proper categorisation under the Sentencing Guidelines for Sexual Offences
- 3 Appropriate reduction for attempt versus completed offence
Ratio Decidendi
The reduction from the notional sentence for a completed rape to reflect the attempt was excessive in this case, given the proximity to completion, aggravating features, and impact on the victim. The original sentence was unduly lenient and a sentence of 5 years and 6 months' imprisonment was the minimum appropriate.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Sentence quashed and substituted.
Orders
- Original sentence of 3 years 9 months' imprisonment quashed.
- Substituted sentence of 5 years 6 months' imprisonment imposed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment