WVF, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 65 (19 January 2023)
The sentencing judge erred by failing to apply the correct Sentencing Council Guideline for causing or inciting a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity and by not finding an abuse of trust. The correct approach required a starting point of 5 years' custody, with appropriate reductions for mitigation and guilty...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 65
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent/offender: WVF
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference (unduly Lenient Sentence) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Abuse of Trust, Child Protection, Appeal Against Sentence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
WVF
Respondent/offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference (unduly Lenient Sentence) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the original sentence imposed on WVF was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether the Sentencing Council Guideline for causing or inciting a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity should have been applied
- 3 Whether there was an abuse of trust by the offender
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by failing to apply the correct Sentencing Council Guideline for causing or inciting a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity and by not finding an abuse of trust. The correct approach required a starting point of 5 years' custody, with appropriate reductions for mitigation and guilty plea, resulting in a sentence of 3 years and 4 months' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence increased
Orders
- Original suspended sentence quashed
- Offender sentenced to 3 years and 4 months' immediate imprisonment on counts 4 to 7, concurrent with each other and with 15 months' imprisonment on counts 1 to 3 (no longer suspended)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment