Attorney General's Reference Nos 86, 87 & 88 of 2004
The original sentences failed to sufficiently reflect the racially aggravated element; an uplift of 18 months was appropriate, resulting in substituted sentences of three years for Broad and Matthews, and three years (plus one year consecutive) for Sellars.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent/offender: Dylan Brian Sellars; Respondent/offender: Simon Ronald Broad; Respondent/offender: Jamie Lee Matthews
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference / Appeal on Sentence by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentences increased.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Racially Aggravated Offences, Grievous Bodily Harm, Attorney General's Reference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Dylan Brian Sellars
Respondent/offender
Simon Ronald Broad
Respondent/offender
Jamie Lee Matthews
Respondent/offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Appeal on Sentence by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed for racially aggravated grievous bodily harm were unduly lenient
- 2 Whether the racially aggravated element was properly reflected in the sentences
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentences failed to sufficiently reflect the racially aggravated element; an uplift of 18 months was appropriate, resulting in substituted sentences of three years for Broad and Matthews, and three years (plus one year consecutive) for Sellars.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentences increased.
Orders
- Substitute sentences of three years for Broad and Matthews for racially aggravated grievous bodily harm.
- Substitute sentence of three years for Sellars for racially aggravated grievous bodily harm; his consecutive one year sentence stands, totaling four years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment