Attorney General's Reference No 59 of 2006
The original sentence was unduly lenient; no exceptional circumstances justified suspension. The appropriate sentence is 18 months' imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent/offender: Nelson Doe; Applicant: Her Majesty's Solicitor General
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Sentence increased; offender to serve 18 months' imprisonment on each count concurrently.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Suspended Sentences, Unduly Lenient Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Nelson Doe
Respondent/offender
Her Majesty's Solicitor General
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether there were exceptional circumstances justifying suspension of sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence was unduly lenient; no exceptional circumstances justified suspension. The appropriate sentence is 18 months' imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently.
Court Disposition
Sentence increased; offender to serve 18 months' imprisonment on each count concurrently.
Orders
- Leave granted to Attorney General to refer case.
- Offender to surrender to Worthing Police Station by midday following day.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment