Attorney Generals Ref 45 of 2008
Neither the age of the offender nor his reason for possessing the firearm, either individually or cumulatively, amounted to exceptional circumstances justifying a sentence below the statutory minimum. The original sentence was unduly lenient and a sentence of three years' detention was appropriate.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Offender: Amar Brahimi
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference / Appeal Against Sentence (attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988)
- Outcome
- Sentence quashed and substituted
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Firearms Offences, Exceptional Circumstances, Minimum Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Amar Brahimi
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Appeal Against Sentence (attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether exceptional circumstances existed to justify a sentence below the statutory minimum
Ratio Decidendi
Neither the age of the offender nor his reason for possessing the firearm, either individually or cumulatively, amounted to exceptional circumstances justifying a sentence below the statutory minimum. The original sentence was unduly lenient and a sentence of three years' detention was appropriate.
Court Disposition
Sentence quashed and substituted
Orders
- The sentence of 12 months' detention and training order is quashed.
- A sentence of three years' detention pursuant to section 91 of the Powers of the Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 is substituted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment