Attorney-General's Reference No 14 of 2009 (Rupert Morgan)
Given the offender's repeated violent offending, premeditated use of weapons, leadership in a group attack, and high risk of serious harm, the sentence was unduly lenient. Only a sentence of imprisonment for public protection is adequate to protect the public. The notional determinate sentence should have been at least 12 years, halved to 6 years as the minimum term before parole eligibility.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Offender/respondent: Rupert Morgan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference / Appeal Against Sentence (attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence quashed and substituted
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Dangerousness, Imprisonment for Public Protection, Robbery, Wounding With Intent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Rupert Morgan
Offender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Appeal Against Sentence (attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether a sentence of imprisonment for public protection should have been imposed
- 3 Appropriate notional determinate sentence for the offences
Ratio Decidendi
Given the offender's repeated violent offending, premeditated use of weapons, leadership in a group attack, and high risk of serious harm, the sentence was unduly lenient. Only a sentence of imprisonment for public protection is adequate to protect the public. The notional determinate sentence should have been at least 12 years, halved to 6 years as the minimum term before parole eligibility.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence quashed and substituted
Orders
- Sentences on both counts quashed
- Substituted sentences of imprisonment for public protection
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment