Attorney General Reference No. 28 of 2010
The original sentence was unduly lenient as it failed to reflect the seriousness, aggravating features, and multiplicity of the offences. The appropriate sentence, after considering totality and the plea of guilty, is twelve years' imprisonment, with sentences on counts 1-19 and counts 20-23 to run consecutively.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent/offender: Michael Anthony Charnley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Sentence Review Under Section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Sentence increased on Attorney General's Reference
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Child Abuse, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Attorney General's Reference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Michael Anthony Charnley
Respondent/offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Sentence Review Under Section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for an offender who procures sexual abuse of children abroad via the internet?
- 2 Did the trial judge err in the application of sentencing guidelines and in ordering sentences to run concurrently?
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence was unduly lenient as it failed to reflect the seriousness, aggravating features, and multiplicity of the offences. The appropriate sentence, after considering totality and the plea of guilty, is twelve years' imprisonment, with sentences on counts 1-19 and counts 20-23 to run consecutively.
Court Disposition
Sentence increased on Attorney General's Reference
Orders
- Total sentence increased to twelve years' imprisonment
- Sentences on counts 1-19 and counts 20-23 to run consecutively
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment