Attorney-General's Reference No 21 of 2016
The original sentence of three-and-a-half years' detention was unduly lenient given the seriousness of the offence, the deliberate use of a knife, the life-threatening injury, the offender's relevant previous convictions, and the fact that the offence occurred shortly after being sentenced for other matters. The reduction for youth was excessive. The appropriate sentence, giving due allowance for age and mitigation, is seven years' detention.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent/offender: Trinity Britton-Paull
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference / Appeal Against Sentence (attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Wounding With Intent, Youth Offenders, Use of Knives, Unduly Lenient Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Trinity Britton-Paull
Respondent/offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Appeal Against Sentence (attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of three-and-a-half years' detention for wounding with intent was unduly lenient for a youth offender.
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence of three-and-a-half years' detention was unduly lenient given the seriousness of the offence, the deliberate use of a knife, the life-threatening injury, the offender's relevant previous convictions, and the fact that the offence occurred shortly after being sentenced for other matters. The reduction for youth was excessive. The appropriate sentence, giving due allowance for age and mitigation, is seven years' detention.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence increased
Orders
- Original sentence of three-and-a-half years' detention quashed
- Substituted sentence of seven years' detention imposed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment