Attorney-General's Reference No 29 of 2008 (Jon Peter Dixon)

Attorney-General's Reference No 29 of 2008 (Jon Peter Dixon)

A non-custodial sentence does not vindicate the principle that children under 13 require protection, even from themselves, and a custodial sentence is required except in vanishingly rare cases. The sentence imposed was unduly lenient and must be replaced with a custodial sentence.

Parties
Applicant: Attorney-General; Respondent/offender: Jon Peter Dixon
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 July 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Outcome
Appeal allowed; sentence quashed and replaced with custodial sentence.
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Protection of Children, Attorney General's Reference

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney-General

Applicant

Jon Peter Dixon

Respondent/offender

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for sexual offences against a child was unduly lenient
  2. 2 Appropriate sentencing principles for sexual activity with a child under 13

Ratio Decidendi

A non-custodial sentence does not vindicate the principle that children under 13 require protection, even from themselves, and a custodial sentence is required except in vanishingly rare cases. The sentence imposed was unduly lenient and must be replaced with a custodial sentence.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; sentence quashed and replaced with custodial sentence.

Orders

  • Original community order quashed.
  • Offender sentenced to 2 years' imprisonment on assault and attempted rape charges, concurrent.