Iqbal, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 689 (10 May 2024)
The sentence, though lenient, was not unduly so and fell within the range reasonably open to the sentencing judge, who properly considered the aggravating and mitigating factors, including the offender's mental health.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 689
- Parties
- Offender: Navid Iqbal; Applicant: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Reference by Attorney General (unduly Lenient Sentence) / Application for Leave to Refer Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Application for leave to refer sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Unduly Lenient Sentence, Sexual Offences, Assault by Penetration, Battery Against Emergency Worker, Sentencing Guidelines, Mental Health in Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Navid Iqbal
Offender
Attorney General
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Reference by Attorney General (unduly Lenient Sentence) / Application for Leave to Refer Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for assault by penetration and battery against an emergency worker was unduly lenient under s.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- 2 Proper categorisation of harm and aggravating/mitigating factors under Sentencing Council guidelines
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence, though lenient, was not unduly so and fell within the range reasonably open to the sentencing judge, who properly considered the aggravating and mitigating factors, including the offender's mental health.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to refer sentence refused
Orders
- Leave to refer sentence under s.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988 refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment