Woolner, R. v
The sentence was unduly lenient because the offence should have been categorised as category 1A, with a starting point of five years' custody, reduced to reflect the absence of actual harm and the guilty plea. The correct sentence is 30 months' imprisonment.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General (Her Majesty's Solicitor General); Respondent/offender: Robert Alan Woolner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Judgment on Reference for Unduly Lenient Sentence
- Outcome
- Reference allowed; sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Unduly Lenient Sentence, Sexual Offences, Sentencing Guidelines, Attempted Offences
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General (Her Majesty's Solicitor General)
Applicant
Robert Alan Woolner
Respondent/offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Judgment on Reference for Unduly Lenient Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for attempting to arrange or facilitate the commission of a child sex offence was unduly lenient
- 2 Proper categorisation of harm under sentencing guidelines where the intended victim is fictitious
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence was unduly lenient because the offence should have been categorised as category 1A, with a starting point of five years' custody, reduced to reflect the absence of actual harm and the guilty plea. The correct sentence is 30 months' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
Reference allowed; sentence increased
Orders
- Sentence on count 1 (attempting to arrange or facilitate commission of a child sex offence) increased to two years' imprisonment after credit for guilty plea
- Consecutive sentences on other counts to stand
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment