Attorney General's Reference No. 58 OF 2006

Attorney General's Reference No. 58 OF 2006

The sentences imposed were unduly lenient given the offenders' possession of a loaded firearm in public; the appropriate sentences are 7 years for Finch and 5 years for Richer, with credit for Richer's guilty plea but not as an exceptional circumstance to depart from the statutory minimum.

Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Offender: Joseph Richer; Offender: David Finch
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 October 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Judgment on Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Outcome
sentences increased
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Firearms Offences, Minimum Sentences, Exceptional Circumstances

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Joseph Richer

Offender

David Finch

Offender

Procedural Posture

Criminal Reference / Judgment on Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988

  1. 1 Whether the sentences imposed were unduly lenient
  2. 2 Whether a guilty plea constitutes exceptional circumstances justifying departure from statutory minimum sentence

Ratio Decidendi

The sentences imposed were unduly lenient given the offenders' possession of a loaded firearm in public; the appropriate sentences are 7 years for Finch and 5 years for Richer, with credit for Richer's guilty plea but not as an exceptional circumstance to depart from the statutory minimum.

Court Disposition

sentences increased

Orders

  • Finch's sentence increased to 7 years' imprisonment
  • Richer's sentence increased to 5 years' imprisonment