Attorney General's Reference No. 58 OF 2006
The sentences imposed were unduly lenient given the offenders' possession of a loaded firearm in public; the appropriate sentences are 7 years for Finch and 5 years for Richer, with credit for Richer's guilty plea but not as an exceptional circumstance to depart from the statutory minimum.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Offender: Joseph Richer; Offender: David Finch
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference / Judgment on Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- sentences increased
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Firearms Offences, Minimum Sentences, Exceptional Circumstances
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Joseph Richer
Offender
David Finch
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Judgment on Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed were unduly lenient
- 2 Whether a guilty plea constitutes exceptional circumstances justifying departure from statutory minimum sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences imposed were unduly lenient given the offenders' possession of a loaded firearm in public; the appropriate sentences are 7 years for Finch and 5 years for Richer, with credit for Richer's guilty plea but not as an exceptional circumstance to depart from the statutory minimum.
Court Disposition
sentences increased
Orders
- Finch's sentence increased to 7 years' imprisonment
- Richer's sentence increased to 5 years' imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment