Gezi, R. v
The original sentence failed to properly reflect the totality and seriousness of the multiple sexual offences committed by the offender, particularly given the abuse of trust, grooming, and psychological harm to the victim. The appropriate sentence after credit for a late guilty plea is 10 years' imprisonment on each count, concurrent.
- Parties
- Offender: Givemore Tonderei Gezi; Applicant: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Abuse of Trust, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Sexual Activity With a Child, Sexual Activity by Care Worker
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Givemore Tonderei Gezi
Offender
Attorney General
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the original sentence was unduly lenient
- 2 Proper approach to sentencing for multiple sexual offences involving a child and a person with a mental disorder by a care worker
- 3 Application of sentencing guidelines to multiple incident counts
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence failed to properly reflect the totality and seriousness of the multiple sexual offences committed by the offender, particularly given the abuse of trust, grooming, and psychological harm to the victim. The appropriate sentence after credit for a late guilty plea is 10 years' imprisonment on each count, concurrent.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; sentence increased
Orders
- Leave to refer granted to Attorney General
- Original sentences quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment