Wood, R. v

Wood, R. v

The sentencing judge properly considered the seriousness of the reference offence, the degree of assistance provided by the offender, and the substantial mitigation present. The sentence, though merciful, was justified and not unduly lenient given the offender's limited, pressured involvement, lack of encouragement, coercion, good character, and impact on her child.

Parties
Applicant: Attorney General (Solicitor General); Respondent/offender: Kayleigh Wood
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 September 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference (unduly Lenient Sentence) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Leave granted; application dismissed; sentence upheld
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Arson, Encouraging or Assisting Crime, Mitigation, Coercion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General (Solicitor General)

Applicant

Kayleigh Wood

Respondent/offender

Procedural Posture

Criminal Reference (unduly Lenient Sentence) / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on Kayleigh Wood for encouraging or assisting arson with intent to endanger life was unduly lenient under section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge properly considered the seriousness of the reference offence, the degree of assistance provided by the offender, and the substantial mitigation present. The sentence, though merciful, was justified and not unduly lenient given the offender's limited, pressured involvement, lack of encouragement, coercion, good character, and impact on her child.

Court Disposition

Leave granted; application dismissed; sentence upheld

Orders

  • No interference with the sentence imposed on Kayleigh Wood