Attorney-General's Reference No 39 of 2016
The original sentence was unduly lenient given the deliberate campaign of intimidation, seriousness of the arson offences, lack of remorse, and breach of restraining orders. The appropriate sentence for arson being reckless as to whether life was endangered should have been six years, with consecutive sentences for related offences, resulting in a total of six and a half years' imprisonment.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Alan Hichens
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Arson, Sentencing, Breach of Restraining Order, Unduly Lenient Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Alan Hichens
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the original sentence imposed for arson and related offences was unduly lenient
- 2 Appropriate sentencing for arson being reckless as to whether life was endangered
- 3 Consideration of dangerousness and extended sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence was unduly lenient given the deliberate campaign of intimidation, seriousness of the arson offences, lack of remorse, and breach of restraining orders. The appropriate sentence for arson being reckless as to whether life was endangered should have been six years, with consecutive sentences for related offences, resulting in a total of six and a half years' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Sentence of three years' imprisonment on count 4 quashed and substituted with six years' imprisonment.
- Consecutive sentence of six months' imprisonment on count 2 retained.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment