Attorney General Reference No 7 of 2011

Attorney General Reference No 7 of 2011

The original sentences for counts 3, 4, and 5 were too lenient given the gravity, abuse of trust, threats, and psychological harm. The sentence for count 7 should run consecutively. The sentence for computer images should run concurrently due to double jeopardy. The total sentence is increased to 6 years to properly reflect total criminality.

Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: John David Smith
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 March 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Appeal
Outcome
sentence increased
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Abuse of Trust, Double Jeopardy, Totality Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

John David Smith

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Reference / Appeal

  1. 1 Appropriate sentencing for historic sexual offences under Sexual Offences Act 1956 in light of Definitive Guidelines under Sexual Offences Act 2003
  2. 2 Application of totality principle in sentencing for multiple offences
  3. 3 Consideration of aggravating factors such as abuse of trust and psychological harm

Ratio Decidendi

The original sentences for counts 3, 4, and 5 were too lenient given the gravity, abuse of trust, threats, and psychological harm. The sentence for count 7 should run consecutively. The sentence for computer images should run concurrently due to double jeopardy. The total sentence is increased to 6 years to properly reflect total criminality.

Court Disposition

sentence increased

Orders

  • Counts 3, 4, and 5 increased to 5 years imprisonment, concurrent.
  • Count 7 (offence against girl H) to run consecutively to counts 1-6.