Sudale, R v

Sudale, R v

The suspended sentence was unduly lenient as there were no exceptional circumstances; perverting the course of justice requires immediate custody. The offender's vulnerability and mitigation were insufficient to justify suspension. Sentence quashed and replaced with immediate imprisonment, reduced for double jeopardy and compliance.

Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Lisa Sudale
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Outcome
Suspended sentence quashed; immediate imprisonment imposed
Legal Topics
Perverting the Course of Justice, Sentencing, Suspended Sentences, Exceptional Circumstances, Mitigation
Criminal Law Perverting the Course of Justice Sentencing Suspended Sentences Exceptional Circumstances Mitigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Lisa Sudale

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Reference / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the suspended sentence for perverting the course of justice was unduly lenient
  2. 2 Whether exceptional circumstances justified suspension of sentence

Ratio Decidendi

The suspended sentence was unduly lenient as there were no exceptional circumstances; perverting the course of justice requires immediate custody. The offender's vulnerability and mitigation were insufficient to justify suspension. Sentence quashed and replaced with immediate imprisonment, reduced for double jeopardy and compliance.

Court Disposition

Suspended sentence quashed; immediate imprisonment imposed

Orders

  • 24-month suspended sentence quashed
  • 18 months' immediate imprisonment substituted