R v Martyn Johnson
Although the sentencing remarks could be read as giving undue weight to the victim's wishes, the sentence imposed was not unduly lenient because the custodial threshold had been crossed but the effective sentence had already been served in custody and on curfew. The judge's decision was within the range of...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Martyn Johnson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Judgment on Reference for Unduly Lenient Sentence
- Outcome
- Reference granted; reference dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stalking, Sentencing, Domestic Abuse, Attorney General's Reference, Conditional Discharge
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Martyn Johnson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Judgment on Reference for Unduly Lenient Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for stalking involving serious alarm or distress was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether the judge erred by relying on the victim's wishes and time served in custody to reduce the sentence
Ratio Decidendi
Although the sentencing remarks could be read as giving undue weight to the victim's wishes, the sentence imposed was not unduly lenient because the custodial threshold had been crossed but the effective sentence had already been served in custody and on curfew. The judge's decision was within the range of reasonable sentences.
Court Disposition
Reference granted; reference dismissed
Orders
- Leave for the Attorney General's Reference granted
- Reference dismissed; sentence not increased
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment