Emerton & Ors, R. v

Emerton & Ors, R. v

The sentences imposed, including life imprisonment for Michael Emerton and extended sentences for Robert Lindsey, Thomas Perry, and Matthew Webby, were not unduly lenient given the extreme depravity, aggravating features, and significant risk posed by the offenders. The judge correctly applied the sentencing guidelines, considered totality, and managed risk through appropriate custodial and extended terms. The credit for guilty pleas was justified due to the complexity of the indictments. Disparities in sentencing were addressed, and only Robert Lindsey's sentence was adjusted to reflect proper guideline application.

Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Michael Robert Emerton; Respondent: Robert David Lindsay; Respondent: Thomas William Perry; Respondent: Matthew Raymond Webby
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 March 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence and Reference for Unduly Lenient Sentencing
Outcome
Appeals against sentence dismissed; Solicitor General's application refused except for adjustment to Robert Lindsey's sentence.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Child Sexual Abuse, Conspiracy, Extended Sentences, Dangerous Offenders
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Sentencing Child Sexual Abuse Conspiracy Extended Sentences Dangerous Offenders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Michael Robert Emerton

Respondent

Robert David Lindsay

Respondent

Thomas William Perry

Respondent

Matthew Raymond Webby

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence and Reference for Unduly Lenient Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sentences imposed were unduly lenient
  2. 2 Whether life and extended sentences were appropriate
  3. 3 Appropriate credit for guilty pleas

Ratio Decidendi

The sentences imposed, including life imprisonment for Michael Emerton and extended sentences for Robert Lindsey, Thomas Perry, and Matthew Webby, were not unduly lenient given the extreme depravity, aggravating features, and significant risk posed by the offenders. The judge correctly applied the sentencing guidelines, considered totality, and managed risk through appropriate custodial and extended terms. The credit for guilty pleas was justified due to the complexity of the indictments. Disparities in sentencing were addressed, and only Robert Lindsey's sentence was adjusted to reflect proper guideline application.

Court Disposition

Appeals against sentence dismissed; Solicitor General's application refused except for adjustment to Robert Lindsey's sentence.

Orders

  • Michael Emerton's appeal against sentence dismissed.
  • Solicitor General's application to increase minimum custodial term refused.