Attorney General's Reference No 49 of 2004
The original sentence of six years was unduly lenient given the aggravating features, including a violent sexual assault and the offender's extensive record of violent offences. A longer than commensurate sentence was necessary to protect the public under section 80(2)(b) of the 2000 Act. The appropriate sentence was nine years' imprisonment, taking into account double jeopardy.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Offender
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference / Appeal (attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing, Unduly Lenient Sentences, Protection of the Public
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Offender
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Appeal (attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for manslaughter was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether a longer than commensurate sentence was necessary to protect the public under section 80(2)(b) of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence of six years was unduly lenient given the aggravating features, including a violent sexual assault and the offender's extensive record of violent offences. A longer than commensurate sentence was necessary to protect the public under section 80(2)(b) of the 2000 Act. The appropriate sentence was nine years' imprisonment, taking into account double jeopardy.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence increased
Orders
- Original sentence of six years' imprisonment quashed
- Substituted sentence of nine years' imprisonment imposed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment