Attorney General Reference No 113 of 2006
The sentence of 3 years custody and 3 years extended licence was within the proper range for this type of manslaughter, considering the offender's age, background, evidence of remorse and improvement, and the absence of intent to cause serious harm. The sentence was not unduly lenient and there was no basis for...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Offender (Callum)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988; Appellate Review of Sentence
- Outcome
- Attorney-General's Reference dismissed; sentence upheld
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing, Extended Sentence, Youth Offenders, Attorney General's Reference
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Offender (Callum)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988; Appellate Review of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for manslaughter was unduly lenient under s.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- 2 Appropriate sentencing range for 'one punch' manslaughter by a youth offender
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of 3 years custody and 3 years extended licence was within the proper range for this type of manslaughter, considering the offender's age, background, evidence of remorse and improvement, and the absence of intent to cause serious harm. The sentence was not unduly lenient and there was no basis for appellate interference.
Court Disposition
Attorney-General's Reference dismissed; sentence upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment