Attorney General's Reference No. 64 OF 2005

Attorney General's Reference No. 64 OF 2005

A sentence of eight years' detention would have been appropriate for the criminality involved, but considering double jeopardy and mitigation, a sentence of six years' detention is substituted for the original four years.

Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Offender
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 October 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Appeal
Outcome
sentence increased
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Robbery, Aggravated Burglary, Kidnap, Mitigation, Double Jeopardy
Criminal Law Sentencing Robbery Aggravated Burglary Kidnap Mitigation Double Jeopardy

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Offender

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Reference / Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for robbery, aggravated burglary, and kidnap was unduly lenient
  2. 2 Appropriate sentencing range for a 19-year-old offender with prior convictions
  3. 3 Effect of mitigation and guilty plea on sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

A sentence of eight years' detention would have been appropriate for the criminality involved, but considering double jeopardy and mitigation, a sentence of six years' detention is substituted for the original four years.

Court Disposition

sentence increased

Orders

  • Original sentence of four years' detention substituted with six years' detention