Attorney General Reference No 130 Of 2004
The minimum term of 14 years was unduly lenient given the aggravating features and seriousness of the crime. The appropriate total discount from the 20 year starting point should have been 4 years, resulting in a minimum term of 16 years.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Offender
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Unduly Lenient Sentence, Murder, Attempted Grievous Bodily Harm, Sentencing Guidelines
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Offender
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the minimum term of 14 years for murder was unduly lenient
- 2 Appropriate discount for guilty plea and age in sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The minimum term of 14 years was unduly lenient given the aggravating features and seriousness of the crime. The appropriate total discount from the 20 year starting point should have been 4 years, resulting in a minimum term of 16 years.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence increased
Orders
- The minimum term of 14 years is quashed and substituted with a term of 16 years custody.
- The offender is credited with 1 year and 3 days already spent in custody.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment