Attorney General's Reference No 29 of 2004
The judge failed to give proper effect to the seriousness of the section 18 offence; a sentence of less than three years' imprisonment was inappropriate. The correct sentence for the section 18 offence is three years, resulting in a total of five years' imprisonment when sentences are made consecutive.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Offender (unnamed)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference / Sentence Review on Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Sentence increased on reference; substituted sentence imposed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Wounding With Intent, Burglary, Common Assault, Use of Weapon, Consecutive Sentences, Unduly Lenient Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Offender (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Sentence Review on Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for wounding with intent was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether the totality of consecutive sentences justified mitigation of individual sentences
Ratio Decidendi
The judge failed to give proper effect to the seriousness of the section 18 offence; a sentence of less than three years' imprisonment was inappropriate. The correct sentence for the section 18 offence is three years, resulting in a total of five years' imprisonment when sentences are made consecutive.
Court Disposition
Sentence increased on reference; substituted sentence imposed.
Orders
- Leave to refer granted.
- Sentence for section 18 offence increased to three years' imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment