Attorney General Reference Nos 108, 109 and 110 of 2008

Attorney General Reference Nos 108, 109 and 110 of 2008

The sentences for Osman and Weight were unduly lenient due to failure to treat separate conspiracies individually and to properly mark aggravating features; Catal's sentence was appropriate based on accepted basis of plea; Olgundeniz's appeal was dismissed as the sentence was not manifestly excessive, despite procedural errors regarding his basis of plea.

Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Osman; Respondent: Weight; Respondent: Catal; Appellant: Murat Olgundeniz; Respondent: Crown
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 February 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Osman's sentence increased to 18 years; Weight's sentence increased to 7 years; Catal's sentence unchanged; Olgundeniz's appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Conspiracy to Supply Drugs, Basis of Plea, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Appeal
Criminal Law Sentencing Conspiracy to Supply Drugs Basis of Plea Unduly Lenient Sentence Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Osman

Respondent

Weight

Respondent

Catal

Respondent

Murat Olgundeniz

Appellant

Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sentences imposed for conspiracy to supply heroin were unduly lenient or manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Appropriate approach to sentencing for multiple conspiracies separated in time
  3. 3 Proper consideration and consistency of bases of plea

Ratio Decidendi

The sentences for Osman and Weight were unduly lenient due to failure to treat separate conspiracies individually and to properly mark aggravating features; Catal's sentence was appropriate based on accepted basis of plea; Olgundeniz's appeal was dismissed as the sentence was not manifestly excessive, despite procedural errors regarding his basis of plea.

Court Disposition

Osman's sentence increased to 18 years; Weight's sentence increased to 7 years; Catal's sentence unchanged; Olgundeniz's appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Osman's sentence substituted with 18 years imprisonment.
  • Weight's sentence substituted with 7 years imprisonment.