R v Samuel Anthony Moulder
The sentencing judge erred by taking a starting point below the guideline range for the second rape, which was a category 2A offence. The correct starting point should have been 10 years, and after considering aggravating and mitigating factors, delay, and totality, the sentence for the second rape should be increased from 8 years to 12 years, with the first rape remaining at 5 years concurrent.
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Samuel Anthony Moulder
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Reference for Review of Sentence
- Outcome
- Reference allowed; sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Sentencing, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Totality, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Samuel Anthony Moulder
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Reference for Review of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in categorising the offences under the Sentencing Council Guidelines
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was unduly lenient
- 3 Whether aggravating and mitigating factors were properly considered
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by taking a starting point below the guideline range for the second rape, which was a category 2A offence. The correct starting point should have been 10 years, and after considering aggravating and mitigating factors, delay, and totality, the sentence for the second rape should be increased from 8 years to 12 years, with the first rape remaining at 5 years concurrent.
Court Disposition
Reference allowed; sentence increased
Orders
- Sentence for second rape increased from 8 years to 12 years' imprisonment
- Sentence for first rape remains at 5 years concurrent with second rape
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment