Toppan Holdings Limited & Anor v Augusta 2008 LLP
The defendant breached contractual and professional duties by failing to comply with contract documents and statutory requirements, causing defects that suppressed occupancy and trading profits. Losses for trading profits, abortive legal costs, and suppressed occupancy interest charges are recoverable as they arose naturally from the breach and were within the parties' contemplation. Losses for overdraft charges, loss of sale, increased interest, and investment losses are too remote and speculative. The defendant was also in breach for failing to notify its insurer as required by clause 6.13A.
- Parties
- Claimant: Toppan Holdings Limited; Claimant: Abbey Healthcare (Mill Hill) Limited; Defendant: Augusta 2008 LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for claimants in part
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Remoteness of Damages, Quantum of Damages, Collateral Warranties, Notification to Insurers, Loss of Trading Profits, Abortive Legal Costs, Interest Charges
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Toppan Holdings Limited
Claimant
Abbey Healthcare (Mill Hill) Limited
Claimant
Augusta 2008 LLP
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant breached contractual and professional duties in the design and construction of the care home
- 2 Whether the defendant failed to comply with clause 6.13A of the building contract regarding notification to insurers
- 3 Whether losses claimed (trading profits, abortive legal costs, overdraft charges, loss of sale, increased interest, investment losses, suppressed occupancy interest) are recoverable and not too remote
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant breached contractual and professional duties by failing to comply with contract documents and statutory requirements, causing defects that suppressed occupancy and trading profits. Losses for trading profits, abortive legal costs, and suppressed occupancy interest charges are recoverable as they arose naturally from the breach and were within the parties' contemplation. Losses for overdraft charges, loss of sale, increased interest, and investment losses are too remote and speculative. The defendant was also in breach for failing to notify its insurer as required by clause 6.13A.
Court Disposition
Judgment for claimants in part
Orders
- Abbey awarded £4,260,000 for loss of trading profits
- Abbey and Toppan each awarded £12,000 for abortive legal costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment