AUL v R
Applicant was not compelled to offend, no slavery or relevant exploitation as defined in law, no evidential basis for section 45 defence or abuse of process stay, and conclusive grounds decision did not justify overturning convictions.
- Parties
- Applicant: AUL; Respondent: REX
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time After Refusal by Single Judge
- Outcome
- Applications for leave to appeal out of time and to adduce further evidence dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Section 45 Modern Slavery Act Defence, Abuse of Process, Drug Offences, Trafficking Victim Status, Conclusive Grounds Decision Admissibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AUL
Applicant
REX
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time After Refusal by Single Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant had a defence under section 45 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015
- 2 Whether prosecution should have been stayed as abuse of process due to applicant's trafficking victim status
- 3 Whether conclusive grounds decision should have led CPS to discontinue prosecution
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant was not compelled to offend, no slavery or relevant exploitation as defined in law, no evidential basis for section 45 defence or abuse of process stay, and conclusive grounds decision did not justify overturning convictions.
Court Disposition
Applications for leave to appeal out of time and to adduce further evidence dismissed.
Orders
- Convictions upheld.
- Applicant's anonymity order continued.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment