Autofocus Ltd v Accident Exchange Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 788 (14 July 2010)

Autofocus Ltd v Accident Exchange Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 788 (14 July 2010)

The Court of Appeal declined to make a declaration that the spot hire rates surveys exhibited to witness statements are protected by witness immunity, holding that the issue remains arguable and should be determined at trial based on the facts as they emerge. The judge below did not conclusively determine the immunity issue, and the appeal was dismissed.

Citation
[2010] EWCA Civ 788
Parties
Appellant: Autofocus Ltd; Respondent: Accident Exchange Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 July 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal to Strike Out Claim or Grant Summary Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Witness Immunity, Strike Out Applications, Summary Judgment, Fraudulent Evidence, Public Policy
Civil Procedure Tort Law Witness Immunity Strike Out Applications Summary Judgment Fraudulent Evidence Public Policy

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Autofocus Ltd

Appellant

Accident Exchange Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal to Strike Out Claim or Grant Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether witness immunity extends to exhibits (spot hire rates surveys) attached to witness statements prepared by rates surveyors for use in litigation
  2. 2 Whether the claim against Autofocus for conspiracy, interference with business, and deceit should be struck out or summarily dismissed on grounds of witness immunity

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal declined to make a declaration that the spot hire rates surveys exhibited to witness statements are protected by witness immunity, holding that the issue remains arguable and should be determined at trial based on the facts as they emerge. The judge below did not conclusively determine the immunity issue, and the appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No declaration made regarding witness immunity for exhibits attached to witness statements
  • Issue of immunity to be determined at trial based on facts