G v Avadis [2003] EWCA Civ 1403 (08 October 2003)
The OSS proceedings are sufficiently analogous to court proceedings to attract absolute privilege to communications made in response to its inquiries; the fraud claim was properly struck out as there was no evidence or particularity to support dishonesty; and the rule of absolute privilege does not infringe Article 6 ECHR.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 1403
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr G; Defendant: Avadis
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Absolute Privilege, Striking Out Claim, Fraud Allegations, Human Rights (article 6 Echr)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr G
Claimant
Avadis
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether communications to the Office of the Supervision of Solicitors (OSS) are protected by absolute privilege
- 2 Whether the fraud claim should be struck out for lack of prospect of success
- 3 Whether the rule of absolute privilege is compatible with Article 6 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The OSS proceedings are sufficiently analogous to court proceedings to attract absolute privilege to communications made in response to its inquiries; the fraud claim was properly struck out as there was no evidence or particularity to support dishonesty; and the rule of absolute privilege does not infringe Article 6 ECHR.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused on all grounds.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment