ADL Advanced Contractors Ltd v Patel [2021] EWHC 2200 (Comm) (04 August 2021)

ADL Advanced Contractors Ltd v Patel [2021] EWHC 2200 (Comm) (04 August 2021)

Summary judgment on the three issues was refused because the issues were not determinative of the claim or any part of it, and the application did not fall within the scope of CPR Part 24. Even if it did, the issues, particularly the effect of the 2019 Guarantees, involved developing areas of law and factual matters that should be determined at trial.

Citation
[2021] EWHC 2200 (Comm)
Parties
Claimant: ADL Advanced Contractors Limited; Defendant: Avnish Patel
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 August 2021
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim (summary Judgment Application) / Interlocutory Application for Summary Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Outcome
Application for summary judgment on preliminary issues refused
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Joint and Several Liability, Release of Guarantors, Construction of Guarantees, Preliminary Issues, Contribution and Subrogation
Contract Law Guarantee/suretyship Civil Procedure Summary Judgment Joint and Several Liability Release of Guarantors Construction of Guarantees Preliminary Issues +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ADL Advanced Contractors Limited

Claimant

Avnish Patel

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Claim (summary Judgment Application) / Interlocutory Application for Summary Judgment on Preliminary Issues

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the 2019 Guarantees released the Defendant from liability under the 2017 Guarantee
  2. 2 Effect of the 2019 Agreements on the cap of the Guarantor's liability under the 2017 Guarantee
  3. 3 Effect of clause 2.3(b)(i) of the 2017 Guarantee if Verdi failed to dispute a valuation within 5 days

Ratio Decidendi

Summary judgment on the three issues was refused because the issues were not determinative of the claim or any part of it, and the application did not fall within the scope of CPR Part 24. Even if it did, the issues, particularly the effect of the 2019 Guarantees, involved developing areas of law and factual matters that should be determined at trial.

Court Disposition

Application for summary judgment on preliminary issues refused

Orders

  • No summary determination of the three issues; all issues to proceed to trial
  • No order for payment into court by Defendant as condition of defending