AW v AH
The applicant is habitually resident in England and Wales, the assets are located in England, and she cannot obtain effective financial relief in China. The court is satisfied it is appropriate to make a financial provision order under Part III of the 1984 Act. The fair outcome is for AH to pay AW a lump sum of...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: AW; Respondent: AH
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Financial Provision Following Overseas Divorce (part Iii, Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984) / Final Judgment After Reserved Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. Financial provision order made under Part III Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984.
- Legal Topics
- Financial Provision After Overseas Divorce, Jurisdiction Under Part III Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Enforcement of Financial Orders, Service of Process, Clean Break Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AW
Applicant
AH
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Financial Provision Following Overseas Divorce (part Iii, Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984) / Final Judgment After Reserved Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court should make a financial provision order under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 following a Chinese divorce
- 2 Whether the applicant meets the jurisdictional and appropriateness requirements under s.15 and s.16 of the 1984 Act
- 3 What is the fair quantum and structure of financial provision for the applicant
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is habitually resident in England and Wales, the assets are located in England, and she cannot obtain effective financial relief in China. The court is satisfied it is appropriate to make a financial provision order under Part III of the 1984 Act. The fair outcome is for AH to pay AW a lump sum of £300,000, with orders for sale of property C and, if necessary, property A, to meet her and her son's needs. The respondent's refusal to engage justifies orders for substituted service and execution of documents by a judge if necessary.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Financial provision order made under Part III Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984.
Orders
- AH to pay AW a lump sum of £300,000.
- Order for sale of property C; if proceeds insufficient, order for sale of property A to satisfy the lump sum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment