AW v Ofsted
The Tribunal found that Ofsted had reasonable grounds to believe that continued provision of childcare by the Appellant may expose children to a risk of harm, particularly due to her lack of insight into the risk posed by her partner and her failure to adhere to her own risk assessment. Suspension was deemed a necessary and proportionate response pending the outcome of ongoing investigations.
- Parties
- Appellant: AW; Respondent: Ofsted
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Care Standards Appeal / Appeal Against Suspension Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Suspension of Registration, Child Protection, Proportionality of Regulatory Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AW
Appellant
Ofsted
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Care Standards Appeal / Appeal Against Suspension Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the threshold for suspension under Regulation 9 is met
- 2 Whether suspension is a necessary and proportionate response
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that Ofsted had reasonable grounds to believe that continued provision of childcare by the Appellant may expose children to a risk of harm, particularly due to her lack of insight into the risk posed by her partner and her failure to adhere to her own risk assessment. Suspension was deemed a necessary and proportionate response pending the outcome of ongoing investigations.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The decision of Ofsted to suspend the registration as a childcare provider on domestic premises on the Early Years Register and both the compulsory and voluntary parts of the Childcare Register dated 17 November 2025 is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment