AX v CY (Article 12; Settlement)
All defences to summary return under the Hague Convention failed: the child was not settled in the UK as of the relevant date; there was no grave risk of harm or intolerable situation if returned to Spain; the child's views did not amount to an objection; and return would not breach fundamental rights. Therefore, the court ordered the child's return to Spain.
- Parties
- Applicant: AX; Respondent: CY
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Child Abduction Under the Hague Convention (child Abduction and Custody Act 1985) / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- Order for return of the child to Spain granted.
- Legal Topics
- Child Abduction, Hague Convention 1980, Custody Rights, Summary Return, Protective Measures, Settlement Defence, Grave Risk of Harm, Child's Objections, Human Rights (article 20)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AX
Applicant
CY
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction Under the Hague Convention (child Abduction and Custody Act 1985) / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the removal of the child from Spain to the UK was wrongful under the Hague Convention 1980
- 2 Whether the child is settled in her new environment (Article 12)
- 3 Whether there is a grave risk of harm or intolerable situation if returned (Article 13(b))
Ratio Decidendi
All defences to summary return under the Hague Convention failed: the child was not settled in the UK as of the relevant date; there was no grave risk of harm or intolerable situation if returned to Spain; the child's views did not amount to an objection; and return would not breach fundamental rights. Therefore, the court ordered the child's return to Spain.
Court Disposition
Order for return of the child to Spain granted.
Orders
- The child shall be returned to Spain as soon as reasonably practicable, subject to Covid-19 travel restrictions.
- Protective measures to be agreed between the parties, including undertakings by the applicant regarding supervised contact, non-molestation, non-removal, withdrawal of police complaint, payment of child maintenance, provision of return flight, and temporary accommodation for the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment