Mora Shipping Inc v AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance S.A. & Ors

Mora Shipping Inc v AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance S.A. & Ors

The Average Guarantee does not oblige the defendants to pay within the jurisdiction; payment could be made either to the shipowners or to the average adjusters, and no single place of performance is established. Therefore, the English court lacks jurisdiction.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Mora Shipping Inc.; Defendant: AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance S.A.; Defendant: Le Continent S.A.; Defendant: Belgian Marine Insurers S.A.; Defendant: Fortis Corporate Insurance N.V.; Defendant: Winterthur Schweizerische Versicherungs-Gesellschaft; Defendant: Generali Assurances Générales
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim / Jurisdictional Challenge
Outcome
Claimant failed to establish jurisdiction; application granted.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Contract Interpretation, General Average, EC Council Regulation 44/2001, Lugano Convention
International Commercial Law Insurance Law Conflict of Laws Jurisdiction Contract Interpretation General Average EC Council Regulation 44/2001 Lugano Convention

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mora Shipping Inc.

Claimant

AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance S.A.

Defendant

Le Continent S.A.

Defendant

Belgian Marine Insurers S.A.

Defendant

Fortis Corporate Insurance N.V.

Defendant

Winterthur Schweizerische Versicherungs-Gesellschaft

Defendant

Generali Assurances Générales

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Claim / Jurisdictional Challenge

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the English court has jurisdiction over the claim based on the place of performance of the payment obligation under the Average Guarantee.
  2. 2 Whether the contract obliges the defendants to pay within the jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The Average Guarantee does not oblige the defendants to pay within the jurisdiction; payment could be made either to the shipowners or to the average adjusters, and no single place of performance is established. Therefore, the English court lacks jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

Claimant failed to establish jurisdiction; application granted.

Orders

  • Issue and service of the Claim Form set aside.
  • Court lacks jurisdiction over the claim.