CORBIN & KING LIMITED v AXA INSURANCE UK PLC
The NDDA clause in the AXA policy is capable of covering losses arising from COVID-19 where there was a danger within one mile of the insured premises, and the government restrictions were imposed in response to such dangers, even if similar dangers existed elsewhere. The policy is composite, so the £250,000 limit applies per premises per restriction event. The disease exclusion only excludes diseases listed in the MSDE clause, not COVID-19.
- Parties
- Claimant: Corbin & King Limited; Claimant: Corbin & King Restaurant Group Limited; Claimant: The Wolseley Restaurant Limited; Claimant: The Wolseley Restaurant Property Limited; Claimant: The Delaunay Restaurant Limited; Claimant: The Delaunay Restaurant Property Limited; Claimant: The Colbert Restaurant Limited; Claimant: Brasserie Zedel Property Limited; Claimant: Brasserie Zedel Limited; Claimant: Fischer’s Restaurant Limited; Claimant: The Bellanger Restaurant Limited; Defendant: AXA Insurance UK PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Insurance Claim / Judgment After Expedited Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Business Interruption Insurance, COVID 19 Pandemic, Policy Construction, Composite Policies, Causation, Denial of Access Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Corbin & King Limited
Claimant
Corbin & King Restaurant Group Limited
Claimant
The Wolseley Restaurant Limited
Claimant
The Wolseley Restaurant Property Limited
Claimant
The Delaunay Restaurant Limited
Claimant
The Delaunay Restaurant Property Limited
Claimant
The Colbert Restaurant Limited
Claimant
Brasserie Zedel Property Limited
Claimant
Brasserie Zedel Limited
Claimant
Fischer’s Restaurant Limited
Claimant
The Bellanger Restaurant Limited
Claimant
AXA Insurance UK PLC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Claim / Judgment After Expedited Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the NDDA clause in the AXA policy covers losses from COVID-19 related government restrictions; Whether the policy limit applies per premises or in aggregate; Whether certain claimants have standing to claim under the policy
Ratio Decidendi
The NDDA clause in the AXA policy is capable of covering losses arising from COVID-19 where there was a danger within one mile of the insured premises, and the government restrictions were imposed in response to such dangers, even if similar dangers existed elsewhere. The policy is composite, so the £250,000 limit applies per premises per restriction event. The disease exclusion only excludes diseases listed in the MSDE clause, not COVID-19.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part
Orders
- AXA is bound to indemnify the Second, Third, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth and Tenth Claimants up to £250,000 per premises for each of the March 2020 closure, September 2020 restriction, and November 2020 closure.
- Alternatively, AXA is to pay damages for wrongful failure to indemnify each such Claimant in respect of each premises up to £250,000 per restriction event.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment