AXA Versicherung Ag v Arab Insurance Group
The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge's finding that Axa failed to discharge the burden of proving that it would have declined the risk if a fair presentation, including loss statistics and explanatory context, had been made. The judge was entitled to be left in doubt as to what the underwriter would have done,...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Axa Versicherung AG; Respondent: Arab Insurance Group
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Non Disclosure, Misrepresentation, Inducement, Fair Presentation of Risk, Avoidance of Insurance Contracts
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Axa Versicherung AG
Appellant
Arab Insurance Group
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the reinsurer (Axa) was induced to enter into the reinsurance treaties by material non-disclosure or misrepresentation by the reinsured (Arig)
- 2 What constitutes a fair presentation of risk in reinsurance
- 3 Whether the judge applied the correct legal test for inducement
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge's finding that Axa failed to discharge the burden of proving that it would have declined the risk if a fair presentation, including loss statistics and explanatory context, had been made. The judge was entitled to be left in doubt as to what the underwriter would have done, and categorical assertions by Axa's witness could not safely be relied upon given the hypothetical nature and lack of recollection.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment