Threlfall v ECD Insight Ltd & Anor
Given Mr Whitney's absolute control of ECD, his personal financial interest, his knowing resiling from the contract, and his bad faith evidence, it is just to make him personally liable for Mr Threlfall's costs, applying the principles for non-party costs orders by analogy.
- Parties
- Appellant: Axel Threlfall; Respondent: ECD Insight Ltd; Respondent: Mr Whitney
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Costs Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Employment Contract, Share Entitlement, Non Party Costs Order, Director Liability for Costs, Corporate Veil, Fidelity Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Axel Threlfall
Appellant
ECD Insight Ltd
Respondent
Mr Whitney
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the director (Mr Whitney) should be personally liable for costs incurred by the company (ECD) in litigation with a former employee (Mr Threlfall)
- 2 Whether the High Court judge erred by failing to consider the principles applicable to non-party costs orders when refusing to make Mr Whitney liable for costs
Ratio Decidendi
Given Mr Whitney's absolute control of ECD, his personal financial interest, his knowing resiling from the contract, and his bad faith evidence, it is just to make him personally liable for Mr Threlfall's costs, applying the principles for non-party costs orders by analogy.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Mr Whitney to pay Mr Threlfall’s costs of the action
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment