AXR v R
The system for handling CHIS status and disclosure, as established by RIPA and the CHIS Code of Practice, is compliant with Article 2 and Article 6 ECHR. Disclosure of CHIS status to prosecutors is only necessary when the accused chooses to rely on that status in his defence. The applicant was not compelled to disclose his status, and the system includes sufficient safeguards. There was no misconduct or defect justifying a stay of proceedings as an abuse of process, and a fair trial is possible.
- Parties
- Applicant: AXR; Respondent: The King
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Refusal to Stay Proceedings as Abuse of Process
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Covert Human Intelligence Sources (chis), Article 2 ECHR (right to Life), Article 6 ECHR (right to Fair Trial), Disclosure Obligations, Prosecutorial Decision Making
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AXR
Applicant
The King
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Refusal to Stay Proceedings as Abuse of Process
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution of a former CHIS should be stayed as an abuse of process due to risks to life and fair trial rights
- 2 Whether the system for handling CHIS status and disclosure complies with Article 2 and Article 6 ECHR
- 3 Whether the absence of automatic disclosure of CHIS status to prosecutors at charge is lawful and compliant with statutory and human rights obligations
Ratio Decidendi
The system for handling CHIS status and disclosure, as established by RIPA and the CHIS Code of Practice, is compliant with Article 2 and Article 6 ECHR. Disclosure of CHIS status to prosecutors is only necessary when the accused chooses to rely on that status in his defence. The applicant was not compelled to disclose his status, and the system includes sufficient safeguards. There was no misconduct or defect justifying a stay of proceedings as an abuse of process, and a fair trial is possible.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal refused
- Anonymity order for the applicant continued
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment