Aziz v FDA (Formerly First Division Association) & Anor
There was no arguable case of bias, the case management and disclosure decisions were within the tribunal's discretion, and the letter from the respondents' solicitors did not amount to victimisation or harassment. The grounds of appeal were misconceived and had no reasonable prospect of success.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Aziz; Respondent: FDA (Formerly First Division Association); Respondent: Russell Jones & Walker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (oral Renewal)
- Outcome
- Applications refused
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Victimisation, Case Management, Disclosure, Bias, Harassment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aziz
Applicant
FDA (Formerly First Division Association)
Respondent
Russell Jones & Walker
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (oral Renewal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in refusing to transfer the case for alleged appearance of bias
- 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in refusing specific disclosure of telephone records
- 3 Whether a letter from the respondent's solicitors constituted victimisation or harassment
Ratio Decidendi
There was no arguable case of bias, the case management and disclosure decisions were within the tribunal's discretion, and the letter from the respondents' solicitors did not amount to victimisation or harassment. The grounds of appeal were misconceived and had no reasonable prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Applications refused
Orders
- Applications for permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment