KA & Anor v B [2024] EWHC 2855 (Fam) (07 November 2024)
Strict application of the domicile requirement would disproportionately interfere with the applicants' Article 8 rights to family life; recognition of the Nigerian adoption order is granted for both applicants despite only one being domiciled in Nigeria.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 2855 (Fam)
- Parties
- First Applicant: KA; Second Applicant: FA; Respondent: B; Intervenor: The Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Recognition of Foreign Adoption Order / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; Nigerian adoption order recognised for both applicants.
- Legal Topics
- Recognition of Foreign Adoption, Domicile, Article 8 ECHR, Public Policy Exceptions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KA
First Applicant
FA
Second Applicant
B
Respondent
The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Application for Recognition of Foreign Adoption Order / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Nigerian adoption order should be recognised at common law in England
- 2 Whether both applicants satisfy the domicile requirement for recognition
- 3 Whether Article 8 ECHR requires relaxation of the domicile requirement
Ratio Decidendi
Strict application of the domicile requirement would disproportionately interfere with the applicants' Article 8 rights to family life; recognition of the Nigerian adoption order is granted for both applicants despite only one being domiciled in Nigeria.
Court Disposition
Application granted; Nigerian adoption order recognised for both applicants.
Orders
- Recognition of the Nigerian adoption order in favour of both KA and FA.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment