Handi-Craft Company & Anor v B Free World Ltd & Ors
Leave to appeal against the costs judgment is refused as costs are within the trial judge's discretion and no issues of principle arise. The Berkovitch defendants must pay the interim costs order of £300,000 in three monthly instalments of £100,000 starting 2 January 2008, as their proposed payment schedule was unsupported by evidence. No stay of the costs order is granted, and no cross-undertaking is required. Costs relating to certain defendants and post-judgment hearings are to be included in the general costs of the action.
- Parties
- Claimant: Handi-Craft Company; Claimant: New Vent Designs Inc; Defendant: B Free World Limited; Defendant: Yasmin Berkovitch; Defendant: Mothercare UK Limited; Defendant: The Boots Company Limited; Defendant: Baby B Free Limited; Defendant: Action Trading Limited (in liquidation); Defendant: Amikam Berkovitch; Defendant: Piero Alberici; Defendant: TTY General Trade Lines Limited; Defendant: Dvora Berkovitch; Defendant: Tamir Tirosh
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Order/costs Determination
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; modalities for payment of costs determined; no stay or cross-undertaking granted; costs orders clarified.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeal Procedure, Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off, Settlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Handi-Craft Company
Claimant
New Vent Designs Inc
Claimant
B Free World Limited
Defendant
Yasmin Berkovitch
Defendant
Mothercare UK Limited
Defendant
The Boots Company Limited
Defendant
Baby B Free Limited
Defendant
Action Trading Limited (in liquidation)
Defendant
Amikam Berkovitch
Defendant
Piero Alberici
Defendant
TTY General Trade Lines Limited
Defendant
Dvora Berkovitch
Defendant
Tamir Tirosh
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Order/costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal against the costs judgment should be granted
- 2 Appropriate modalities for payment of costs by the Berkovitch defendants
- 3 Whether a stay of the costs order pending appeal should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal against the costs judgment is refused as costs are within the trial judge's discretion and no issues of principle arise. The Berkovitch defendants must pay the interim costs order of £300,000 in three monthly instalments of £100,000 starting 2 January 2008, as their proposed payment schedule was unsupported by evidence. No stay of the costs order is granted, and no cross-undertaking is required. Costs relating to certain defendants and post-judgment hearings are to be included in the general costs of the action.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; modalities for payment of costs determined; no stay or cross-undertaking granted; costs orders clarified.
Orders
- Berkovitch defendants to pay £300,000 interim costs in three monthly instalments of £100,000 starting 2 January 2008.
- No stay of costs order pending appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment