S, R v [2002] EWCA Crim 542 (25 February 2002)

S, R v [2002] EWCA Crim 542 (25 February 2002)

The evidence, including psychiatric reports and the nature and timing of previous offences, demonstrated that the appellant did not pose a significant risk to the public, rebutting the statutory presumption of dangerousness and constituting exceptional circumstances. Therefore, an automatic life sentence was not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Crim 542
Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: B J S
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 February 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence Following Reference by the Criminal Cases Review Commission
Outcome
Appeal allowed; automatic life sentence quashed; determinate sentence imposed.
Legal Topics
Automatic Life Sentences, Exceptional Circumstances, Dangerousness Assessment, Sentencing for Rape, Human Rights Act Impact
Criminal Law Automatic Life Sentences Exceptional Circumstances Dangerousness Assessment Sentencing for Rape Human Rights Act Impact

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

B J S

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence Following Reference by the Criminal Cases Review Commission

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant posed a significant risk to the public justifying an automatic life sentence under section 109 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000
  2. 2 Whether there were exceptional circumstances to disapply the statutory requirement for a life sentence

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence, including psychiatric reports and the nature and timing of previous offences, demonstrated that the appellant did not pose a significant risk to the public, rebutting the statutory presumption of dangerousness and constituting exceptional circumstances. Therefore, an automatic life sentence was not justified and a determinate sentence was appropriate.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; automatic life sentence quashed; determinate sentence imposed.

Orders

  • Automatic life sentence quashed
  • Substituted sentence of six years' imprisonment